Backend Hardening Under Live Traffic

Blitzly is an AI agent platform that helps people launch business ideas fast. Sky Insights engineered and hardened its production backend on Vercel, AWS and Supabase — then used live beta traffic as the test rig. Instead of synthetic load tests alone, we validated caching, load-balancing and concurrency controls against real user sessions and traffic spikes.

Core Performance Indicators:

1M+ Live Requests

Blitzly beta traffic processed without performance degradation — real sessions and agent workflows, not simulated load profiles.

Zero Unplanned Outages

Backend stayed stable through every high-concurrency spike; latent memory and routing issues found and fixed under live conditions.

Quick Look

Sector
  • AI consumer SaaS; business launch & agent platforms
Key Technologies
  • Vercel
  • AWS
  • Supabase
  • Node.js
  • Redis
  • Nginx
Product

Region: Delaware, USA

The Situation

Blitzly runs multiple AI agents — Scout, Brand, Outreach, Legal and Launch — that turn a single business idea into a live launch flow. During public beta, traffic was unpredictable: waitlist signups, agent runs and page loads spiked together in ways lab tests never reproduced.

Standard load-testing tools can approximate volume, but they miss chaotic patterns — uneven agent workloads, long-running sessions and repeat hits on the same launch assets. That leaves hidden risks: memory leaks after sustained use, Supabase query paths that choke under contention, and edge routes on Vercel that overload while background workers sit idle.

The goal was not a greenfield rebuild. Sky Insights needed to harden the stack Blitzly already ran on and prove it under the same live traffic their users were generating — using Blitzly’s own beta as the test rig.

Real founders hitting real agent flows exposed bottlenecks that synthetic benchmarks had missed — the only useful signal was live traffic on the production stack.

Our Approach

We instrumented Blitzly’s production path end to end — Vercel edge and serverless routes, AWS services, Supabase reads/writes and Redis cache layers — and tuned against live beta traffic, not synthetic benchmarks alone.

Live Traffic as the Test Rig

As Blitzly’s beta grew, request volume passed one million live interactions across agent workflows, landing pages and API calls. Telemetry on Vercel and AWS captured latency, error rates and resource usage in real time — giving us behaviour to tune against instead of lab-only metrics.

Caching Built for Spikes

We added Redis caching around the heaviest read paths — repeated agent outputs, launch previews and shared assets — so burst traffic did not hammer Supabase on every request. Repeat queries served from memory kept response times steady when many users hit the same flows at once.

Concurrency and Routing Optimization

We monitored how traffic distributed across Vercel functions and AWS-backed workers, then refined Nginx routing and backend configuration. Memory allocation was profiled and leaks removed. Routing was adjusted so no single node saturated during asymmetric spikes. The stack now degrades gracefully instead of failing suddenly.

The Results

Launching a high-traffic AI product and need infrastructure proven under real users?

“We were nervous about beta traffic spiking in ways lab tests never caught. They tuned the stack against real users. We passed a million requests without a single unplanned outage.”

Co-founder, Blitzly

We harden production stacks on Vercel, AWS and Supabase — validating caching, load-balancing and concurrency under live traffic before your next spike hits.

Connect With Us

More Case Studies